MODIS Atmosphere
MODIS Atmosphere Home Products  Images  Validation  News  Staff  Forum  Reference  Tools  Help
Aerosol Product  Water Vapor Product  Cloud Product  Atmosphere Profile Product  Cloud Mask Product   Joint Atmosphere ProductLevel-2 Products
Daily Global Product  Eight-Day Global Product  Monthly Global ProductLevel-3 Products       Filled Land Surface Albedo ProductFilled Normalized Difference Vegetative Index ProductOne-Minute Land Ecosystem Classification ProductLevel-3 Ancillary Land Surface Products
MOD05_L2
Introduction
Format & Content
Grids & Mapping
Sample Images
QA Information
Modification History
Acquiring Data
Filename Convention
Analysis Tools
Theoretical Basis
Validation
Detailed File Spec
Algorithm Software
Production Plan
Support Team

QA Information

For data collected prior to 1 Nov 2001, the infrared total water vapor product (SDS Water_Vapor_Infrared) should be considered invalid for any retrieval location where the total precipitable water vapor exceeds 7.0 centimeters (especially obvious at times over the African Sahara). In addition, the infrared total precipitable water vapor has a wet bias on the order of 10-20%. The infrared water vapor algorithms have not been corrected in order to maintain consistency in this first year of MODIS Collection 3 products. Spatial and temporal gradients are believed to be representative and useful. Corrections will be in place for data collected after 1 Nov 2001.

The radiometrical calibrations for some of the MODIS channels, in particular the channel centered at 1.24 micrometer, are problematic. Errors in radiometeric calibrations can introduce errors in water vapor values retrieved from MODIS data causing some of the water vapor values to be higher than 20 cm, out of range of typical water vapor values.

Water Vapor results compared well between MODIS near-IR vapor and the DOE ARM microwave radiometer water vapor over an extended time period (about 1 year). We also got excellent agreement between MODIS vapor and microwave radiometer data collected in a recent China field experiment.

Typical errors are 10% or less for water vapor values over land. Additional validation needs to be done for retrievals over snow and ice-covered surfaces. DOE ARM has a microwave radiometer in Barrow, Alaska. We didn't get good agreement between microwave radiometer vapor and MODIS vapor over Barrow. This microwave radiometer is known to have calibration problems. As a result, we cannot reach a conclusion based on comparison between MODIS vapor and microwave radiometer vapor over snow and ice covered surfaces. By looking our L3 near-IR vapor products, all seasonal variations seem to be realistic. We cannot see any obvious errors with the near-IR vapor, but the IR vapor from U. of Wisconsin showed obvious unrealistic large amounts of water vapor over desert areas.

Information provided by Dr. Bo-Cai Gao, Naval Research Laboratory.

Next Page
NEWS